---
title: "Submittable Alternative for Scholarship Management | AwardSpring"
description: "Comparing AwardSpring and Submittable? See how a scholarship-first platform differs from a general submission manager on matching, donor reporting, and campus fit."
canonical_url: "https://www.awardspring.com/compare/submittable-alternative"
markdown_url: "https://www.awardspring.com/compare/submittable-alternative.md"
---

1.  [Home](https://www.awardspring.com/)
2.  [Compare](https://www.awardspring.com/compare)
3.  Submittable

PLATFORM COMPARISON

# Looking for a Submittable alternative?

Submittable is a broad submission-management platform spanning grants, corporate giving, and scholarships, with real scale: Scholarship America selected it as its technology provider in 2025. AwardSpring is built specifically for scholarships, donors, and funds at colleges, universities, and foundations. The difference is scholarship-specific depth versus program breadth.

AT A GLANCE

## Comparison table

AwardSpring and Submittable at-a-glance comparison

Criterion

AwardSpring

Submittable

Core buyer

Colleges, universities, and scholarship foundations

Foundations, corporations, and administrators running grants, CSR, and scholarships together

Single application with auto-matching

Yes, for every customer

Per-program eligibility screening; cross-fund matching not documented as of August 2026

Scholarship + donor management

One platform, one record

Donor reporting documented in its corporate-giving products, not the scholarship product

Integrations

Built for financial aid and foundation office workflows

Two-way API; Salesforce, DocuSign, Candid, PeopleSoft; SAML/OIDC SSO

Support

16-minute average response; 4.7 of 5 on G2 across 110 reviews

Published 12-minute average tech-support response

AI

SpringIQ: AI drafts and prepares, people decide

AI Assistant generates application forms; document parsing and review summaries

### Core buyer

AwardSpring

Colleges, universities, and scholarship foundations

Submittable

Foundations, corporations, and administrators running grants, CSR, and scholarships together

### Single application with auto-matching

AwardSpring

Yes, for every customer

Submittable

Per-program eligibility screening; cross-fund matching not documented as of August 2026

### Scholarship + donor management

AwardSpring

One platform, one record

Submittable

Donor reporting documented in its corporate-giving products, not the scholarship product

### Integrations

AwardSpring

Built for financial aid and foundation office workflows

Submittable

Two-way API; Salesforce, DocuSign, Candid, PeopleSoft; SAML/OIDC SSO

### Support

AwardSpring

16-minute average response; 4.7 of 5 on G2 across 110 reviews

Submittable

Published 12-minute average tech-support response

### AI

AwardSpring

SpringIQ: AI drafts and prepares, people decide

Submittable

AI Assistant generates application forms; document parsing and review summaries

WHY AWARDSPRING

## When institutions choose AwardSpring over Submittable

Criterion 1

### Matching across every fund, not screening per program.

Students complete one AwardSpring application and are matched to every scholarship they qualify for, so committees start scoring on day one. Submittable's help center documents per-program Eligibility Forms, a screening step in front of a specific project's application; we found no Submittable documentation of automatically matching one general application across many funds.

Criterion 2

### Donor reporting where the scholarships live.

AwardSpring's donor reporting runs on the same record as awarding. Submittable's documented donor reporting sits in its corporate-giving products (the Bright Network portal); its scholarship product page does not mention donor reporting or stewardship for scholarship donors as of August 2026.

Criterion 3

### A platform sized to scholarship teams.

Capterra reviewers rate Submittable highly (4.8 of 5 across nearly 400 reviews) and also note that the cost can feel difficult to sustain within a modest operating budget.

THE HONEST FIT

## When Submittable may fit better

-   An organization running grants, CSR and employee giving, and scholarships side by side on one platform (its 2024 WizeHive acquisition brought Bright Funds employee giving into the family).
-   A foundation or corporate program that pays recipients directly: Submittable advertises disbursing funds to scholars and fellows from the same place applications are accepted.
-   Programs with multilingual applicant pools: Submittable's AI Assistant generates application forms in English, Spanish, French, and German.
-   Publishers, media organizations, and arts programs running open-call submissions, which sit outside a scholarship-specific platform's scope.

SWITCHING

## Switching from Submittable: what the move looks like

1.  **Export your data.** Applicants, awards, and program history come out as spreadsheets. You own your data.
2.  **Guided rebuild.** SpringBoard onboarding recreates your scholarships, cycles, and review workflows, and imports historical data.
3.  **Cut over between cycles.** Implementation is timed so your next award cycle opens on AwardSpring.

FAQ

## Questions about this comparison

Is AwardSpring a good alternative to Submittable?

For scholarship-first organizations, yes: matching, review, awarding, and donor reporting are the whole product. For organizations whose scholarship program is one of many submission programs, Submittable's breadth may serve better.

How does AwardSpring pricing compare to Submittable?

Both are quote-based annual subscriptions. AwardSpring includes unlimited applicants, reviewers, and admins, scoped to institution size and award volume.

Can we migrate from Submittable to AwardSpring?

Yes. Most customers switch between award cycles, and historical data comes across during onboarding.

KEEP COMPARING

## Related comparisons

[AwardSpring vs Blackbaud Award Management Read the Blackbaud Award Management comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/awardspring-vs-blackbaud)

[Looking for a Foundant SLM alternative? Read the Foundant SLM comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/foundant-alternative)

[Looking for a Kaleidoscope alternative? Read the Kaleidoscope comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/kaleidoscope-alternative)

[Looking for an OpenWater alternative? Read the OpenWater comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/openwater-alternative)

[Looking for a NextGen Scholarship Manager alternative? Read the Scholarship Manager (Next Gen, a Nelnet company) comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/nextgen-scholarship-manager-alternative)

[Looking for a ScholarshipUniverse alternative? Read the ScholarshipUniverse (Ellucian) comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/scholarshipuniverse-alternative)

[Looking for a SmarterSelect alternative? Read the SmarterSelect comparison.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare/smarterselect-alternative)

[Compare scholarship management platforms Return to the comparison hub and choose another live evaluation path.](https://www.awardspring.com/compare)

## Request a demo.

Bring your Submittable renewal quote and we will walk the same workflow side by side.

[Request a demo](https://www.awardspring.com/demo)
