Blog Layout

Two-Year School Enrollment: 2020 Data & What to Expect in 2021

Kurt Reilly • Jan 04, 2021

As 2020 draws to a close, we’re finally getting data about how truly strange the year has been.

Naturally, we’ve been particularly interested in seeing how colleges and universities have fared this year. And it was a surprise to see that student enrollment was down for two-year schools. Many of us expected to see an increase this year, as a weaker economy generally translates to greater enrollment in two-year schools. The timing and impact of the pandemic led us to expect that many students who had planned to attend four-year institutions would reconsider and enroll in community and junior colleges instead, as proximity to the family home and the prospect of significant cost savings in a turbulent economic climate could make local schools a smarter investment. But that’s not what happened.


The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center reports that of all higher education institutions, community colleges endured the largest decline in undergrad enrollment in 2020, at 10.1% - a nearly ninefold increase of the losses experienced in fall of 2019. Of all measures of post-secondary and master’s students at two-year, four-year, non-profit, and for-profit schools, the steepest decline in enrollment was among freshmen at two-year schools at 18.9%, almost 19 times the pre-pandemic loss rate. Demographically, the biggest losses were among Native American, Hispanic, and Black students, and the decline in male enrollment was almost three times as high as the decline in female enrollment.


In our view, these figures reflect the unevenness of the pandemic’s impact on employment across America. Low-income families, whose members are most likely to pursue an affordable education at a two-year school as a path out of poverty, also experienced the most job loss this year. For this population, even a small reduction in income can make the difference between attending school and postponing for another year or two. Affluent families with breadwinners who can easily work from home may have actually saved money this year, as entertainment spending declined but salaries remained largely the same. These families had no economic reason to reconsider their educational plans.


Change is on the horizon, and we’re optimistic about what it means for two-year schools. The incoming Biden/Harris administration has demonstrated an interest in managing the pandemic more seriously than the current administration, which could accelerate a return to safe gatherings that stimulate spending. Plans to vaccinate the general public for COVID-19 in 2021 also suggest the potential for a return to life that’s more like what we experienced pre-pandemic. If previously lost jobs come back, or if the Biden administration provides stronger economic support to working families, new income could result in a return to educational pursuits that had been put on hold. And there’s reason to believe that more students will choose two-year schools over four-year schools: our incoming First Lady, Dr. Jill Biden, is a major advocate for community colleges. The cost of four-year tuition continues to rise. And we expect an increased demand for workers with associate’s degrees, particularly in health care, coupled with a smaller pool of graduates. These factors are likely to drive renewed interest in two-year degrees amongst potential students of all ages.


One way you can prepare for what 2021 will bring is to partner with AwardSpring. When enrollment is down, you’ll appreciate the time and cost savings that AwardSpring gives you, so you can redirect funds and energy to your highest priority goals. Plus, our easy-to-use universal application helps you capture those students who would have left a paper application unfinished; two-year schools typically see a 50% increase in applications with our platform. When enrollment is high, our solution maximizes your award distribution, helping you make the case for more funds from your donors and driving more growth over time. Learn more about how AwardSpring can help your institution manage its scholarship program.


AwardSpring Blog

By Jill Murphy 08 Feb, 2024
The FAFSA Simplification Act has brought about significant changes to the financial aid landscape, ushering in a new era in the FAFSA application process. While you’re likely familiar with the details, let's take a moment to recap the key highlights of this transformative legislation. Key Changes: Transition to SAI: The cornerstone of the FAFSA Simplification Act is the replacement of the Expected Family Contribution (EFC) with the Student Aid Index (SAI). This shift aims to provide a more nuanced assessment of financial need, offering flexibility with SAI values, including the possibility of negative figures down to -1500. SAR to FSS: Another notable change is the rebranding of the Student Aid Report (SAR) as the FAFSA Submission Summary (FSS), reflecting the evolving nature of the application process. Negative SAI and PELL Grant Eligibility: One of the significant departures from the previous system is the allowance for negative SAIs. This change necessitates adjustments in how institutions package students for need-based aid. Additionally, PELL grant eligibility will now be determined using criteria separate from the FAFSA and resultant SAI, with the incorporation of IRS tax return data where feasible. As you embark to adapt these new protocols, it's essential to remain informed and proactive in navigating the evolving landscape of higher education finance. As an AwardSpring partner, we’ve made suggestions on how to leverage these changes to better support students on their educational journeys and ensure access to the opportunities they deserve. AwardSpring offers the following recommendations to guide institutions through this process: Recommendation #1: Expected Family Contribution (EFC) to Student Aid Index (SAI) The most consequential change to teams that are putting together Financial Aid packages or making scholarship awarding decisions are the EFC to SAI transition. We recommend you consider one of two options: Option 1: Re-label existing EFC fields as SAI to maintain continuity in data collection If you choose to re-label existing EFC fields, be mindful that doing so may impact historical data analysis, requiring a clear understanding by the consumers of any reports of the transition from EFC to SAI effective the date you make this conversion Option 2: Keep your existing EFC fields for historical purposes and create a new SAI field In this instance, you’ll need a thorough review of all of your qualifications and/or awarding decision-making processes to ensure SAI is being used and EFC is properly retired Notables: In the case where you’re using our SIS Integration feature, we’ll want to coordinate which path you’ve chosen so we can update the import process accordingly AwardSpring currently doesn’t allow our numeric fields to go negative creating a gap between the new SAI protocol and our existing numeric fields. We’ll be addressing this in a March, 2024 release so you can capture negative SAI values, if desired In either case, you’ll want to review scholarship qualifications tied to EFC and/or SAI, and ensure compatibility with the possibility of negative SAI values Recommendation #2: Student Aid Report (SAR) to FAFSA Submission Summary (FSS) Much like repurposing EFC for SAI in our first recommendation, you have another consideration with SAR vs. FSS: Option 1: Evaluate the option of re-labeling existing SAR upload fields as FSS to streamline data collection recognize that this adjustment repurposes the field, necessitating careful consideration of historical data interpretation Option 2: Alternatively, create separate fields to accommodate the transition, albeit with potential rework depending on your unique configuration and whether you utilize SIS Integration Recommendation #3: Other FAFSA Fields There’s more variability here since you may have a wide degree of fields to consider. You should tailor any changes based on the specific field type, whether it’s being used as a qualification, and whether you’d need to make corresponding changes in your SIS. Summary Proactive assessment and strategic adaptation of FAFSA-related questions are crucial to seamlessly transition to the new framework outlined by the FAFSA Simplification Act. By carefully considering these recommendations, you can ensure alignment with regulatory changes while maintaining efficiency and accuracy in financial aid processes. As always, if you’d like to talk with our expert staff, don’t hesitate to reach out to us at support@awardspring.com.
AwardSpring: The #1 Scholarship Management Software
By The AwardSpring Team 22 Sep, 2023
We're absolutely thrilled to announce that AwardSpring has clinched the prestigious #1 spot in the G2 report for Scholarship Management Software, but we didn't stop there!
Show More
Share by: