Blog Layout

Why "Right Now" Is the Perfect Time

Kurt Reilly • Nov 20, 2020

If you’re unhappy with your paper-based scholarship management process or software solution, what has held you back from making a change? For many, it’s timing. It just never seems to be the right time to evaluate new options and embark on an implementation. There’s always too much to do, some bigger priority, or a sense of being overwhelmed before even beginning the process.


We’ve all felt it. But the truth is, the best time to make a change like this is NOW - no matter what else is going on. Here’s why:


  • Easiest Implementation Ever:

We’ve carefully structured our Springboard implementation experience to make it as simple and carefree for you as possible. We train you using your real data, so all of your scholarships are set up exactly the way you want once training is over. The whole process takes about two to four months*. During that time, we’re doing all the data entry, so you can keep on managing scholarships exactly the way you always have - no interruptions. All told, you’ll personally spend about just a few hours on AwardSpring implementation, broken up into super-manageable one-hour and half-hour meetings over the course of a few months


"The SpringBoard implementation team was extremely helpful. They were patient with me and persistent in making sure our site was configured and I was properly trained. They also did all the heavy lifting with my IT team!"

-Elizabeth Gilmer, East Georgia State College


Painless implementation is just the first step. Once you’re up and running, you can expect several benefits right away, but there are two that really make it worth the effort to get to this stage as quickly as possible.


  • Cost Savings & Efficiency

AwardSpring customers typically save 20–30% when they switch from a competitor. On top of that, adding AwardSpring’s universally beloved support team to your process is like adding another full-time employee at no extra cost. With a new online process, office supply costs - on paper, ink, even staples - are reduced. Best of all, administrators can expect to spend 50% less time on scholarship management once they’re using AwardSpring; that’s 80+ hours per year for the average 2-year school administrator. Freeing up that time creates the opportunity to focus on more important, interesting work while saving more money than our platform costs!


"Because everything is more streamlined and efficient, I’m able to spend more time being innovative, creative, and entrepreneurial in working toward our overall program goals."

-Nicole Ferris, Pierce College



At AwardSpring, we've been intentional about creating the easiest path possible to better scholarship administration. If you're ready to save time and money on scholarship management, there's no time like the present!

Learn More

* 2-4 months is our average implementation timeline for a typical customer. Your timing may vary depending on the size and complexity of your program

AwardSpring Blog

By Jill Murphy 08 Feb, 2024
The FAFSA Simplification Act has brought about significant changes to the financial aid landscape, ushering in a new era in the FAFSA application process. While you’re likely familiar with the details, let's take a moment to recap the key highlights of this transformative legislation. Key Changes: Transition to SAI: The cornerstone of the FAFSA Simplification Act is the replacement of the Expected Family Contribution (EFC) with the Student Aid Index (SAI). This shift aims to provide a more nuanced assessment of financial need, offering flexibility with SAI values, including the possibility of negative figures down to -1500. SAR to FSS: Another notable change is the rebranding of the Student Aid Report (SAR) as the FAFSA Submission Summary (FSS), reflecting the evolving nature of the application process. Negative SAI and PELL Grant Eligibility: One of the significant departures from the previous system is the allowance for negative SAIs. This change necessitates adjustments in how institutions package students for need-based aid. Additionally, PELL grant eligibility will now be determined using criteria separate from the FAFSA and resultant SAI, with the incorporation of IRS tax return data where feasible. As you embark to adapt these new protocols, it's essential to remain informed and proactive in navigating the evolving landscape of higher education finance. As an AwardSpring partner, we’ve made suggestions on how to leverage these changes to better support students on their educational journeys and ensure access to the opportunities they deserve. AwardSpring offers the following recommendations to guide institutions through this process: Recommendation #1: Expected Family Contribution (EFC) to Student Aid Index (SAI) The most consequential change to teams that are putting together Financial Aid packages or making scholarship awarding decisions are the EFC to SAI transition. We recommend you consider one of two options: Option 1: Re-label existing EFC fields as SAI to maintain continuity in data collection If you choose to re-label existing EFC fields, be mindful that doing so may impact historical data analysis, requiring a clear understanding by the consumers of any reports of the transition from EFC to SAI effective the date you make this conversion Option 2: Keep your existing EFC fields for historical purposes and create a new SAI field In this instance, you’ll need a thorough review of all of your qualifications and/or awarding decision-making processes to ensure SAI is being used and EFC is properly retired Notables: In the case where you’re using our SIS Integration feature, we’ll want to coordinate which path you’ve chosen so we can update the import process accordingly AwardSpring currently doesn’t allow our numeric fields to go negative creating a gap between the new SAI protocol and our existing numeric fields. We’ll be addressing this in a March, 2024 release so you can capture negative SAI values, if desired In either case, you’ll want to review scholarship qualifications tied to EFC and/or SAI, and ensure compatibility with the possibility of negative SAI values Recommendation #2: Student Aid Report (SAR) to FAFSA Submission Summary (FSS) Much like repurposing EFC for SAI in our first recommendation, you have another consideration with SAR vs. FSS: Option 1: Evaluate the option of re-labeling existing SAR upload fields as FSS to streamline data collection recognize that this adjustment repurposes the field, necessitating careful consideration of historical data interpretation Option 2: Alternatively, create separate fields to accommodate the transition, albeit with potential rework depending on your unique configuration and whether you utilize SIS Integration Recommendation #3: Other FAFSA Fields There’s more variability here since you may have a wide degree of fields to consider. You should tailor any changes based on the specific field type, whether it’s being used as a qualification, and whether you’d need to make corresponding changes in your SIS. Summary Proactive assessment and strategic adaptation of FAFSA-related questions are crucial to seamlessly transition to the new framework outlined by the FAFSA Simplification Act. By carefully considering these recommendations, you can ensure alignment with regulatory changes while maintaining efficiency and accuracy in financial aid processes. As always, if you’d like to talk with our expert staff, don’t hesitate to reach out to us at support@awardspring.com.
AwardSpring: The #1 Scholarship Management Software
By The AwardSpring Team 22 Sep, 2023
We're absolutely thrilled to announce that AwardSpring has clinched the prestigious #1 spot in the G2 report for Scholarship Management Software, but we didn't stop there!
Show More
Share by: